The growing recognition of executive functions and other higher order cognitive functions in predicting student outcomes has prompted the demand for efficient and reliable methods of measuring a student's cognitive abilities. MindPrint was developed to measure performance across a range of neurobehavioral domains using a computerized neurocognitive battery.

Digital Promise research, sponsored by a Walton Family Foundation grant, is ongoing to demonstrate the effect of the MindPrint Solution on teacher efficacy and student outcomes.

High-dosage tutoring is one of the most effective ways to produce learning gains for a broad variety of students. MindPrint can enable schools to scale high-dosage tutoring affordably while adhering to core principles outlined by Brown University's Annenberg Center.

This paper summarizes the key findings of Intellectual Precocity: What Have We Learned Since Terman? and explain how these findings have been directly translated into features of the MindPrint solution. It details the measurements of intellectual capability, describes how intellectual capability correlates longitudinally with academic and career achievement across student sub-populations, and suggests implications for educational and counselor interventions to enable students to live up to their full potential.

This third party research, funded by NSF Grant 2133397, establishes the validity and reliability of MindPrint's social-emotional screener of eight core skill constructs. This research study demonstrates that the MindPrint cognitive assessment, in combination with demographic variables and the social-emotional screener, explained 64% of the variance in MAP Growth scores.

This paper details how cognitive assessments offer the unique capacity to objectively and efficiently pinpoint the reasons for variability in performance across traditional assessments, thus making data interpretation straightforward for key stakeholders.

This paper details the methodology behind the development of the MindPrint Assessment and provides reliability and validity evidence.

This paper provides additional validity evidence for the MindPrint Assessment, supporting its feasibility for large-scale use cases.

This report summarizes the findings from Phase I of MindPrint's NSF SBIR grant. We provide reliability and validity evidence for our social and emotional skills assessment, and we show how the MindPrint Assessment and the social and emotional skills assessment can account for nearly 64% of the variance in MAP Growth scores.

This paper, written by Dr. Kate Walton, MindPrint's Director of Research, tackles a challenge to the field of SEL — the overabundance of disparate and empirically unfounded SEL frameworks. Walton and colleagues provide empirical support for using the well-known Big Five personality framework for organizing social and emotional skills.

MindPrint's cognitive assessment was the same one used to understand the impacts of long-duration spaceflight in the seminal NASA Twins study. Just think, you could discover that your students think just like NASA astronauts!

This whitepaper details the MindPrint Theory of Action and direct connection to improve academic and social and emotional outcomes.